Custom Search

View Full Version : DUMB answers bakit hindi sila naka-HELMET


Pages : [1] 2 3 4

bobbyS4
September 20th, 2008, 09:29 PM
One morning @ Macapagal Hiway, Pasay area-

While driving my cage , I saw a Pasay Traffic aide may back ride pa , both had no helmets:C

So i slowed down, rolled down my window, and asked...

Bossing bakit di ka naka helmet?

Trafffice Aide - "Boss nag papatuyo lang sir ng buhok.":eek:

DUH:nuts:

noypito
September 20th, 2008, 09:52 PM
sir, ano lang ba ang kinokonsider mo na wise answer sa tanong mo? puede na ba yung "ayoko mag helmet" o dapat medyo profound ang answer nya citing all available studies and statistics to support his choice of not wearing a helmet?

r4rosal
September 21st, 2008, 12:21 AM
question is kung sakali kaya tuyo na buhok nya, magsuot na kaya siya ng helmet? :)

pilyo82
September 22nd, 2008, 12:32 PM
kaso choice nilang wag mag helmet para matuyo ang buhok nila,, tingin ko mas importante pa buhok nila compara sa ulo nila,

maxlyn04
September 22nd, 2008, 01:36 PM
One morning @ Macapagal Hiway, Pasay area-

While driving my cage , I saw a Pasay Traffic aide may back ride pa , both had no helmets:C

So i slowed down, rolled down my window, and asked...

Bossing bakit di ka naka helmet?

Trafffice Aide - "Boss nag papatuyo lang sir ng buhok.":eek:

DUH:nuts:

hindi na bago sakin yan,.halos araw araw ako dumadaan macapagal,morning and night,..pero halos araw araw ko rin sila nakikitang ganyan,...walang helmet,both pass.kung todo wala pang plate at may plate man,wala naman sticker.

turboglendz
September 22nd, 2008, 03:04 PM
One morning @ Macapagal Hiway, Pasay area-

While driving my cage , I saw a Pasay Traffic aide may back ride pa , both had no helmets:C

So i slowed down, rolled down my window, and asked...

Bossing bakit di ka naka helmet?

Trafffice Aide - "Boss nag papatuyo lang sir ng buhok.":eek:

DUH:nuts:
di ako naniniwala sa kwento neto. traffic aid tatanungin mo ng ganun? eh kung pulis un di tatanungin mo din? wow..

bacolodnon
September 22nd, 2008, 03:13 PM
answer: eh ayokong mag helmet, di ako comfortable mag helmet, wala kang pakialam kahit mabasag man bungo ko kasi ulo ko naman to, hindi naman eto sayo...

dumb or not? :D

turboglendz
September 22nd, 2008, 03:16 PM
answer: eh ayokong mag helmet, di ako comfortable mag helmet, wala kang pakialam kahit mabasag man bungo ko kasi ulo ko naman to, hindi naman eto sayo...

dumb or not? :D
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..

jon _beza
September 22nd, 2008, 03:17 PM
Marami po dito niyan sa Pasay na walang helmet paglabas palang ng munisipyo wala na suot, pulis o traffic aid. bakit ko alam? kasi dito ako nag-work sa tapat ng munisipyo ng pasay.

Darth Maul
September 22nd, 2008, 03:32 PM
________

subscribing...

ÆDraven3020
September 22nd, 2008, 03:43 PM
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..

Errrr... Kaka Shower ko lang sa Motel.. Basa pa buhok ko noh....:D

GigaByte
September 22nd, 2008, 03:47 PM
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..

Kelan pa naging DUMB ang pagpapakita ng concern sa kapwa? IMHO they cannot enforce the law if they themselves don't follow it.. Get it.. Its dumber to throw comments like that.. Ikaw magkwento tapos yung TS ang maniniwala.. How's that?..

Billy Jack
September 22nd, 2008, 03:52 PM
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..
ang itanong mo muna sir turboglendz ay kung kilala mo ba si sir bobbyeS4? i myself, hindi lang po tanong! sisnisita ko talaga! dahil 36 years na po ako nagbabayad ng pangsweldo nila... kilalanin nyo po muna kung sino si sir bobbyeS4, baka sa susunod ay kayo naman ang masita nya dyan sa laguna... RIDE SAFELY!

Mamaw™
September 22nd, 2008, 03:53 PM
Pogi1: Bakit hinde ka nka helmet?

Pogi2: Wala lang, mas cute kasi kung walang helmet..


nyehehehehe...

subscribing

Billy Jack
September 22nd, 2008, 04:43 PM
Originally Posted by turboglendz
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..
Kelan pa naging DUMB ang pagpapakita ng concern sa kapwa? IMHO they cannot enforce the law if they themselves don't follow it.. Get it.. Its dumber to throw comments like that.. Ikaw magkwento tapos yung TS ang maniniwala.. How's that?..
siguro po ay malaki ang takot nila sa mga enforcers sa lugar nila, kaya hindi kapanipaniwala sa kanya ang magtanong sa mga ito...

GigaByte
September 22nd, 2008, 05:03 PM
FYI Mr Turbowhatever- Enforcers are there to serve you not the other way around, so bakit ka matatakot na tanungin sila? Or sitahin pwede din, ke pulis man yan.. If you enforce the law you should abide with it FIRST..

RavCai-16
September 22nd, 2008, 05:19 PM
@TS nice thread here...

kung diba naman dumb eh....

ginawa pang hair-dyer ung motor :O



dapat sir medyo biniro mo na din..

"Bossing ingat lang sa pagmamaneho, baka mabasa ulit buhok mo" (sabay ngiting aso :D )

ewan ko lang kung di mag-helmet un :O

Christer
September 22nd, 2008, 05:38 PM
answer: eh ayokong mag helmet, di ako comfortable mag helmet, wala kang pakialam kahit mabasag man bungo ko kasi ulo ko naman to, hindi naman eto sayo...

dumb or not? :D

panu kung ganto sagot..

answer: gusto ko nang mamatay eh, pakielam mo ba? sama ka ba?

dumb din ba or not? hehe!:O

iam580
September 22nd, 2008, 05:51 PM
nice thread. keeps my adrenalin pumping. keep those ideas coming guys:D

supremedan
September 22nd, 2008, 06:14 PM
up ko lang sa mga sagot nyo...

For me. the law maker is the law breaker!!!
Diba ang sabi nga no one is above the law. pero dito sa pinas kapag nasa government ka nagwowork e you are above the law. simple lang naman yan not a dumb answer.
pansinin nyo kung hindi taffic aide ay pulis ang nagmomotor na walng helmet. kasi nga ang batas natin dito sa pinas is not for safety reason. its for compliance only. maghelmet tayo para iwas huli. kasi iyan ang mentality ng mga law enforcer dito sa bansa ni juan. kaya iyan ang isip nila paglaw enforcer ka walang pwede manita sayo.

Just my few words:crazy:

jerk18
September 22nd, 2008, 06:22 PM
Wag na lang natin sila paki-alaman...

Kanya-kanyang buhay yan...

pag ba nadisgrasya sila eh mapeperwisyo ka nila?..

At yung tungkol naman sa mga sweldo naman nila, wag nyo na ipagmalaki dito yun kasi kung tutuusin sa dami ng nagababayad ng tax eh baka wala pa ngang 1 sentimo lang yun...

iam580
September 22nd, 2008, 06:39 PM
meron pong check and balance na sinasabi, so kung nakikita tayo na mga erring government employees o sino man diyan na gumagawa ng kalokohan, pewede natin ipaalam sa mga authority. gather documents, gather evidences at iparating sa mga kinauukulan. approach people whom you think can help. get their assistance. i know there are people there who can not tolerate thse malpractices. and i know if you will approach them, you will find justice. but if we just let them do what they want e kitang kita naman natin, we we are not helping eradicate corruption. there's a saying that "it takes 2 to tango", so if we dance with them and even provide the music, then ganito na lang tayo.

peace.

Mamaw™
September 22nd, 2008, 06:41 PM
up ko lang sa mga sagot nyo...

For me. the law maker is the law breaker!!!
Diba ang sabi nga no one is above the law. pero dito sa pinas kapag nasa government ka nagwowork e you are above the law. simple lang naman yan not a dumb answer.
pansinin nyo kung hindi taffic aide ay pulis ang nagmomotor na walng helmet. kasi nga ang batas natin dito sa pinas is not for safety reason. its for compliance only. maghelmet tayo para iwas huli. kasi iyan ang mentality ng mga law enforcer dito sa bansa ni juan. kaya iyan ang isip nila paglaw enforcer ka walang pwede manita sayo.

Just my few words:crazy:

tama ka jan sir...
tulad na lang sa araneta avenue, me kasabay kami nka sando at walang helmet..aba akalain mo un along e.rod stoplight bigla siyang nag Go!
tapos ung katabi ko napa iling sabi ko"huli yan" anak ng tinapa,kinamayan lang nya at nag apir pa!! tropa nya pala ung mga nka Yellow na uniform dun sa kabilang kalye..wahahahaha ako naman ang napailing nun...

Razi3l
September 22nd, 2008, 06:52 PM
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..

Rubbish! :D

The law applies to all! It' s not an issue of who should be asking who. Kapag may nakitang mali dapat sinisita kahit na ka uniporme pa yan.

maxlyn04
September 23rd, 2008, 08:14 AM
hindi yan dumb answer. ang dumb eh ung tatanungin mo ang ibang tao at pakikialaman mo kung bakit walang helmet lalo na at di k naman lto o traffic aid. at traffic aid ang tinanong mo? kapanipaniwala ba? hay naman..


kailangan ba maging pulis o trapik aid ka para magmalasakit sa ibang tao?
i dont think its a dumb moves.

kapanipaniwala?yup.//why not?just because hindi mo magawa,eh hindi na kayang gawin nang iba.

jon _beza
September 23rd, 2008, 08:26 AM
kailangan ba maging pulis o trapik aid ka para magmalasakit sa ibang tao?
i dont think its a dumb moves.

kapanipaniwala?yup.//why not?just because hindi mo magawa,eh hindi na kayang gawin nang iba.

+10:clap:

wala dapat ikatakot kung alam mo nasa tama ka...

h3lios
September 23rd, 2008, 11:43 AM
What concerns me is why people while driving or riding have to sidle up to an unhelmeted rider just to point out or ask why he's not wearing a helmet.

What if you startled him and he loses control because of your act? I guess most of you will say:"yan kasi, di naghelmet!"

The only effect the helmet law is to make many people law-breakers. We are just indignant that some people (police, traffic enforcers, military personnel, etc) can get away with things that we ordinary people cannot.

enes
September 23rd, 2008, 12:24 PM
What concerns me is why people while driving or riding have to sidle up to an unhelmeted rider just to point out or ask why he's not wearing a helmet.

What if you startled him and he loses control because of your act? I guess most of you will say:"yan kasi, di naghelmet!"

The only effect the helmet law is to make many people law-breakers. We are just indignant that some people (police, traffic enforcers, military personnel, etc) can get away with things that we ordinary people cannot.

oo nga...kung baket ba naman sa gitna pa ng biyahe pinagsasabihan...:rolleyes:

ang tanong ko lang...ginagawa niya ba ito sa lahat ng nakikita niyang naka motor na walang helmet? or dun lang sa mga traffic or law enforcers?

systemofadown!
September 23rd, 2008, 12:53 PM
philippines dumbest government officials-employee!...

-no to lto AO nd no to 2nd plate-

Brisk48/1
September 23rd, 2008, 01:24 PM
DO HELMET REALLY SAVE LIVES?
(facts gathered while surfing the Net)

We all probably have anecdotal evidence that helmets really save lives, I know I do . But there are some facts that make me think twice before I wear one.
Have you studied your helmet? Look deep into its comforting plush lining, and hidden amidst the soft fuzz you’ll find a warnings label: “Some reasonably foreseeable impacts may exceed the helmet’s capability to protect severe injury or death”. What is a “reasonably foreseeable” impact? Any impact around 23-kph or greater. Motorcycle helmets are tested by being dropped on an anvil from a height of six feet, the equivalent of a 21.98-kph impact. If you ride at speeds less than 23-kph and are involved only in accidents involving stationary objects, you’re golden. A typical motorcycle accident, however , would be a rider traveling at, say, 48-kph, and being struck by a car making a left turn at, maybe, 24-kph. That’s an effective cumulative impact of 72-kph. Assume the rider is wearing a helmet, and that he is struck directly on the head. The helmet reduces the blow to an impact of 50.02-kph (72-kph minus 21.98-kph). Still enough to kill the rider.
An object breaks at its weakest point. Some helmets advocates in the USA argue that while helmets may not reduce the overall death rate, they prevent death due to head trauma. A professor of economics at Bowdoin College, in Brunswick, Maine, USA wondered how this could be. If fatal head traumas were decreasing, then some other kind of fatal injury must be rising to make up the difference. Applying his expertise in econometrics to statistic gathered about motorcycle related accident, he discovered what was happening, that there exist a reciprocal relationship between death due to head trauma and death due to neck injury. That is, a 4 pound helmet might save the head, but the force is then transferred to the neck. He found out that helmets begin to increase one’s chances of a fatal neck injury at speeds exceeding 20-kph, about the same impact at which helmets can no longer soak up kinetic energy. For this reason, a Chicago heart surgeon who performs more than 300 operations per year and rides his dark-violet, chopped Harley Softail to work at a local Hospital, refuses to wear a helmet. “Your head may be saved” he says, “but your neck will be broken.”
False confidence. Wearing a helmet can lead to excessive risk-taking due to the unrealistic sense of protection that a rider feels when he dons one, making him feel safe when he really isn’t. Helmet can never compensate for lack of judgement. One of the senses that keep a rider aware of things outside of his peripheral vision is his hearing. Dog barks, vehicle horns, and other dangers coming from blindside before seeing them, while wearing a helmet GREATLY limits this sense, leaving the rider vulnerable to accident from blindside. Those individual who wear radio headphones in their helmets are even in great danger.
Helmets are mandatory at racing events because they are RACING, not going for a cruise. To race, a rider push the end of adhesion, push the limits of his own riding abilities. On the street, a rider goes for a drive at a leisurely pace, not racing. Unless his not as educated and responsible as some of as do.
The best way to avoid serious injuries is to avoid having an accident. The key elements for this are education and experience, because, no motorcycle helmet will improve a riders awareness and skills. EDUCATION, promote programs to educate riders to be defensive and responsible riders. Remember that it is not what you put ON your head that will save your life, it is what you put IN your head that will save your life. EXPERIENCE, there ain’t but 3 types of riders in the world; Those that will have a wreak, those that have had a wreak, and those that will have another wreak. So far I place myself in the first 2 categories and what will keep me out of the last category is how I ride my scoot, wearing a helmet has nothing to do with that.

bacolodnon
September 23rd, 2008, 01:32 PM
DO HELMET REALLY SAVE LIVES?
(facts gathered while surfing the Net)

We all probably have anecdotal evidence that helmets really save lives, I know I do . But there are some facts that make me think twice before I wear one.
Have you studied your helmet? Look deep into its comforting plush lining, and hidden amidst the soft fuzz you’ll find a warnings label: “Some reasonably foreseeable impacts may exceed the helmet’s capability to protect severe injury or death”. What is a “reasonably foreseeable” impact? Any impact around 23-kph or greater. Motorcycle helmets are tested by being dropped on an anvil from a height of six feet, the equivalent of a 21.98-kph impact. If you ride at speeds less than 23-kph and are involved only in accidents involving stationary objects, you’re golden. A typical motorcycle accident, however , would be a rider traveling at, say, 48-kph, and being struck by a car making a left turn at, maybe, 24-kph. That’s an effective cumulative impact of 72-kph. Assume the rider is wearing a helmet, and that he is struck directly on the head. The helmet reduces the blow to an impact of 50.02-kph (72-kph minus 21.98-kph). Still enough to kill the rider.
An object breaks at its weakest point. Some helmets advocates in the USA argue that while helmets may not reduce the overall death rate, they prevent death due to head trauma. A professor of economics at Bowdoin College, in Brunswick, Maine, USA wondered how this could be. If fatal head traumas were decreasing, then some other kind of fatal injury must be rising to make up the difference. Applying his expertise in econometrics to statistic gathered about motorcycle related accident, he discovered what was happening, that there exist a reciprocal relationship between death due to head trauma and death due to neck injury. That is, a 4 pound helmet might save the head, but the force is then transferred to the neck. He found out that helmets begin to increase one’s chances of a fatal neck injury at speeds exceeding 20-kph, about the same impact at which helmets can no longer soak up kinetic energy. For this reason, a Chicago heart surgeon who performs more than 300 operations per year and rides his dark-violet, chopped Harley Softail to work at a local Hospital, refuses to wear a helmet. “Your head may be saved” he says, “but your neck will be broken.”
False confidence. Wearing a helmet can lead to excessive risk-taking due to the unrealistic sense of protection that a rider feels when he dons one, making him feel safe when he really isn’t. Helmet can never compensate for lack of judgement. One of the senses that keep a rider aware of things outside of his peripheral vision is his hearing. Dog barks, vehicle horns, and other dangers coming from blindside before seeing them, while wearing a helmet GREATLY limits this sense, leaving the rider vulnerable to accident from blindside. Those individual who wear radio headphones in their helmets are even in great danger.
Helmets are mandatory at racing events because they are RACING, not going for a cruise. To race, a rider push the end of adhesion, push the limits of his own riding abilities. On the street, a rider goes for a drive at a leisurely pace, not racing. Unless his not as educated and responsible as some of as do.
The best way to avoid serious injuries is to avoid having an accident. The key elements for this are education and experience, because, no motorcycle helmet will improve a riders awareness and skills. EDUCATION, promote programs to educate riders to be defensive and responsible riders. Remember that it is not what you put ON your head that will save your life, it is what you put IN your head that will save your life. EXPERIENCE, there ain’t but 3 types of riders in the world; Those that will have a wreak, those that have had a wreak, and those that will have another wreak. So far I place myself in the first 2 categories and what will keep me out of the last category is how I ride my scoot, wearing a helmet has nothing to do with that.

the statements in blue fonts contradict each other...

the article states that helmets can only protect ones head at speed below 23kph, and then justify its use in racing due to the risk involve :eek:

also, spills dont usually result in neck injuries but hairline cracks in the skull...

Christer
September 23rd, 2008, 01:51 PM
DO HELMET REALLY SAVE LIVES?
(facts gathered while surfing the Net)

We all probably have anecdotal evidence that helmets really save lives, I know I do . But there are some facts that make me think twice before I wear one.
Have you studied your helmet? Look deep into its comforting plush lining, and hidden amidst the soft fuzz you’ll find a warnings label: “Some reasonably foreseeable impacts may exceed the helmet’s capability to protect severe injury or death”. What is a “reasonably foreseeable” impact? Any impact around 23-kph or greater. Motorcycle helmets are tested by being dropped on an anvil from a height of six feet, the equivalent of a 21.98-kph impact. If you ride at speeds less than 23-kph and are involved only in accidents involving stationary objects, you’re golden. A typical motorcycle accident, however , would be a rider traveling at, say, 48-kph, and being struck by a car making a left turn at, maybe, 24-kph. That’s an effective cumulative impact of 72-kph. Assume the rider is wearing a helmet, and that he is struck directly on the head. The helmet reduces the blow to an impact of 50.02-kph (72-kph minus 21.98-kph). Still enough to kill the rider.
An object breaks at its weakest point. Some helmets advocates in the USA argue that while helmets may not reduce the overall death rate, they prevent death due to head trauma. A professor of economics at Bowdoin College, in Brunswick, Maine, USA wondered how this could be. If fatal head traumas were decreasing, then some other kind of fatal injury must be rising to make up the difference. Applying his expertise in econometrics to statistic gathered about motorcycle related accident, he discovered what was happening, that there exist a reciprocal relationship between death due to head trauma and death due to neck injury. That is, a 4 pound helmet might save the head, but the force is then transferred to the neck. He found out that helmets begin to increase one’s chances of a fatal neck injury at speeds exceeding 20-kph, about the same impact at which helmets can no longer soak up kinetic energy. For this reason, a Chicago heart surgeon who performs more than 300 operations per year and rides his dark-violet, chopped Harley Softail to work at a local Hospital, refuses to wear a helmet. “Your head may be saved” he says, “but your neck will be broken.”
False confidence. Wearing a helmet can lead to excessive risk-taking due to the unrealistic sense of protection that a rider feels when he dons one, making him feel safe when he really isn’t. Helmet can never compensate for lack of judgement. One of the senses that keep a rider aware of things outside of his peripheral vision is his hearing. Dog barks, vehicle horns, and other dangers coming from blindside before seeing them, while wearing a helmet GREATLY limits this sense, leaving the rider vulnerable to accident from blindside. Those individual who wear radio headphones in their helmets are even in great danger.
Helmets are mandatory at racing events because they are RACING, not going for a cruise. To race, a rider push the end of adhesion, push the limits of his own riding abilities. On the street, a rider goes for a drive at a leisurely pace, not racing. Unless his not as educated and responsible as some of as do.
The best way to avoid serious injuries is to avoid having an accident. The key elements for this are education and experience, because, no motorcycle helmet will improve a riders awareness and skills. EDUCATION, promote programs to educate riders to be defensive and responsible riders. Remember that it is not what you put ON your head that will save your life, it is what you put IN your head that will save your life. EXPERIENCE, there ain’t but 3 types of riders in the world; Those that will have a wreak, those that have had a wreak, and those that will have another wreak. So far I place myself in the first 2 categories and what will keep me out of the last category is how I ride my scoot, wearing a helmet has nothing to do with that.


:Dbro. pweyde po ba pakitagalog? hehe


pess poh.. pess poh tayu! hehe

ganda poh..

@bacolodnon

bro panu mu naintindihan yun.. english yun.. diba pareho lang tayo.. hehe:D

bacolodnon
September 23rd, 2008, 01:56 PM
:Dbro. pweyde po ba pakitagalog? hehe


pess poh.. pess poh tayu! hehe

ganda poh..

@bacolodnon

bro panu mu naintindihan yun.. english yun.. diba pareho lang tayo.. hehe:D

psssst..OT ka...actually hinulaan ko lang yun :O

para di Ot, ano pa kaya mga dumb response nila?

Brisk48/1
September 23rd, 2008, 02:11 PM
The best way to avoid serious injuries is to avoid having an accident. The key elements for this are education and experience, because, no motorcycle helmet will improve a riders awareness and skills. EDUCATION, promote programs to educate riders to be defensive and responsible riders. Remember that it is not what you put ON your head that will save your life, it is what you put IN your head that will save your life. EXPERIENCE, there ain’t but 3 types of riders in the world; Those that will have a wreak, those that have had a wreak, and those that will have another wreak. So far I place myself in the first 2 categories and what will keep me out of the last category is how I ride my scoot, wearing a helmet has nothing to do with that.


Ano masasabi mo dito? nakaranas ka na ba ng aksidente? Gano katagal ka na nag momotor? Masasabi mo ba na experienced rider ka na? The point here is "Do helmet really save Lives?" for me the the true essence of riding a motorcycle is freedom so walang paki alaman ng trip...

bacolodnon
September 23rd, 2008, 02:27 PM
Ano masasabi mo dito? nakaranas ka na ba ng aksidente? Gano katagal ka na nag momotor? Masasabi mo ba na experienced rider ka na? The point here is "Do helmet really save Lives?" for me the the true essence of riding a motorcycle is freedom so walang paki alaman ng trip...

Do helmet really saves lives? ABsolutely yes, witnessed it couple of times. :)

I agree that the safest way is to have education, but isnt wearing a helmet a part of a safety course?

Riding a motorcycle is freedom, youre right. But it does not make helmet wearing riders less free either, does it?

Admit that you hate being regulated and imposed upon to compliance. Forget about the "freedom" blah blah...:)

its up for others if your answer is "dumb" or not...

peace broham. ridesafe

Christer
September 23rd, 2008, 02:35 PM
Do helmet really saves lives? ABsolutely yes, witnessed it couple of times. :)

I agree that the safest way is to have education, but isnt wearing a helmet a part of a safety course?

Riding a motorcycle is freedom, youre right. But it does not make helmet wearing riders less free either, does it?

Admit that you hate being regulated and imposed upon to compliance. Forget about the "freedom" blah blah...:)

its up for others if your answer is "dumb" or not...

peace broham. ridesafe


+1 may tama ko bro.

OT
@bacolodnon

waaw! english! pacheese burger ka naman dyan!:O

burger! burger! burger!:banana::banana:

bacolodnon
September 23rd, 2008, 02:42 PM
+1 may tama ko bro.

OT
@bacolodnon

waaw! english! pacheese burger ka naman dyan!:O

burger! burger! burger!:banana::banana:

lanheya...copy paste lang yung sagot ko...:rolleyes::O

rockhound
September 23rd, 2008, 02:44 PM
Sa tingin ko po...

Sa mga ayaw mag-helmet.. may mga ilalabas na evidence na ang helmet ay masama pag nagmomotorsiklo ka.

Sa mga naghehelmet.. may mga ilalabas din na evidence na nakakasagip ng buhay ang helmet.

Paikot-ikot lang tong usapan na to depende sa kung sino tatanungin mo.

Kaya kung ako po ang tatanungin, kanya-kanyang trip na lang yan.
Wag na lang nating pakialaman mga taong ayaw mag helmet.
It's their life, not yours.

Sa akin lang, ayaw kong mabukulan pag sumemplang ako at speeds lower than 23kph. And for speeds higher than that na may malaking chance na matigok ako, ayaw kong matigok na basag ang mukha ko. Patay ka na nga, nagkalasog-lasog pa mukha mo. hehehe

lantismarco
September 23rd, 2008, 03:00 PM
One morning @ Macapagal Hiway, Pasay area-

While driving my cage , I saw a Pasay Traffic aide may back ride pa , both had no helmets:C

So i slowed down, rolled down my window, and asked...

Bossing bakit di ka naka helmet?

Trafffice Aide - "Boss nag papatuyo lang sir ng buhok.":eek:

DUH:nuts:
theory ko,

ang talagang intensyon nila ay, mas gusto nilang 180 degree ang vision nila para makahuli sila ng MC driver na may violation, kase pag naka helmet ka almost 90 degree lang ang vision mo, ganun din ang purpose ng backride nya para over-all 360 degree ang vision nila,,, mas maraming huli mas maraming extra income... tama ba?

peace...

turboglendz
September 23rd, 2008, 03:02 PM
ang itanong mo muna sir turboglendz ay kung kilala mo ba si sir bobbyeS4? i myself, hindi lang po tanong! sisnisita ko talaga! dahil 36 years na po ako nagbabayad ng pangsweldo nila... kilalanin nyo po muna kung sino si sir bobbyeS4, baka sa susunod ay kayo naman ang masita nya dyan sa laguna... RIDE SAFELY!
hindi ko sya kilala, so siguro hindi sya ka level ni ping lacson. fyi, marami akong kilalang pulis general. kung kayo eh makikialam pa sa mga tao na walang helmet at tatabihan nyo pa para tanungin lang kung bakit wlang helmet, hindi concern un. pagpapasikat un. ang mahirap kase dito eh kapag nagpakatotoo ka, kung anu ano reaksyon ng iba. eh di sana kung ganun pala na maninita ka, lahat ng walang helmet habulin mo at sitahin. eh kung kayo nagkukunwaring matapang at maninita ng traffic aid o pulis, di kayo na lang. para namang talgang sa tunay na buhay eh magagawa nyo. mga plastik.

mikafajardo
September 23rd, 2008, 03:07 PM
Bob,

Sabi ng wag magpo-post ng ganito sa MCP eh:banana:Di ka maiintindihan:clap:

Anong parlor daw sila galing:nuts: Were they wearing sandals or open toes para matuyo din ang cuticle?:*

enes
September 23rd, 2008, 03:10 PM
hindi ko sya kilala, so siguro hindi sya ka level ni ping lacson. fyi, marami akong kilalang pulis general. kung kayo eh makikialam pa sa mga tao na walang helmet at tatabihan nyo pa para tanungin lang kung bakit wlang helmet, hindi concern un. pagpapasikat un. ang mahirap kase dito eh kapag nagpakatotoo ka, kung anu ano reaksyon ng iba. eh di sana kung ganun pala na maninita ka, lahat ng walang helmet habulin mo at sitahin. eh kung kayo nagkukunwaring matapang at maninita ng traffic aid o pulis, di kayo na lang. para namang talgang sa tunay na buhay eh magagawa nyo. mga plastik.

yun nga din yung tinatanong ko kung ginagawa niya ba yun sa lahat ng nakikitang niyang walang helmet sa daan, o dun lang sa mga traffic at law enforcer...:rolleyes:

enes
September 23rd, 2008, 03:13 PM
Anong parlor daw sila galing:nuts: Were they wearing sandals or open toes para matuyo din ang cuticle?:*

baka yung nail polish...natutuyo naman agad yung cuticle eh...:O

mikafajardo
September 23rd, 2008, 03:29 PM
hindi ko sya kilala, so siguro hindi sya ka level ni ping lacson. fyi, marami akong kilalang pulis general. kung kayo eh makikialam pa sa mga tao na walang helmet at tatabihan nyo pa para tanungin lang kung bakit wlang helmet, hindi concern un. pagpapasikat un. ang mahirap kase dito eh kapag nagpakatotoo ka, kung anu ano reaksyon ng iba. eh di sana kung ganun pala na maninita ka, lahat ng walang helmet habulin mo at sitahin. eh kung kayo nagkukunwaring matapang at maninita ng traffic aid o pulis, di kayo na lang. para namang talgang sa tunay na buhay eh magagawa nyo. mga plastik.

Ayan Bob, me bading na naman na may crush sa iyo:banana::banana::banana:

Psst wag kang masyadong high blood at di ka tatagal. Fyi, di Orocan si sir Bobbye. Baka mamaya pakuryente kita sa kanya:nuts:

turboglenda
September 23rd, 2008, 03:35 PM
hindi ko sya kilala, so siguro hindi sya ka level ni ping lacson. fyi, marami akong kilalang pulis general. kung kayo eh makikialam pa sa mga tao na walang helmet at tatabihan nyo pa para tanungin lang kung bakit wlang helmet, hindi concern un. pagpapasikat un. ang mahirap kase dito eh kapag nagpakatotoo ka, kung anu ano reaksyon ng iba. eh di sana kung ganun pala na maninita ka, lahat ng walang helmet habulin mo at sitahin. eh kung kayo nagkukunwaring matapang at maninita ng traffic aid o pulis, di kayo na lang. para namang talgang sa tunay na buhay eh magagawa nyo. mga plastik.

AGREE AKO SAYO TOL!!! :clap: KEEP ON ROCKING! :clap:

turboglendz
September 23rd, 2008, 03:58 PM
Ayan Bob, me bading na naman na may crush sa iyo:banana::banana::banana:

Psst wag kang masyadong high blood at di ka tatagal. Fyi, di Orocan si sir Bobbye. Baka mamaya pakuryente kita sa kanya:nuts:
sorry po. baka lalo kayo magmukhang matanda. gurang ka na nga eh.

turboglendz
September 23rd, 2008, 03:59 PM
si mikafajardo ba eh tomboy?

mikafajardo
September 23rd, 2008, 04:20 PM
si mikafajardo ba eh tomboy?


Uy, pikon na ang bading he he. Sige na nga tomboy na ako:nuts::nuts:

Billy Jack
September 23rd, 2008, 05:44 PM
hindi ko sya kilala, so siguro hindi sya ka level ni ping lacson. fyi, marami akong kilalang pulis general. kung kayo eh makikialam pa sa mga tao na walang helmet at tatabihan nyo pa para tanungin lang kung bakit wlang helmet, hindi concern un. pagpapasikat un. ang mahirap kase dito eh kapag nagpakatotoo ka, kung anu ano reaksyon ng iba. eh di sana kung ganun pala na maninita ka, lahat ng walang helmet habulin mo at sitahin. eh kung kayo nagkukunwaring matapang at maninita ng traffic aid o pulis, di kayo na lang. para namang talgang sa tunay na buhay eh magagawa nyo. mga plastik.
manay glenda, sa tinitirhan ko nga po sa abroad ay pinapatanggal pa namin ang mga law rnforcers na di sumusunod sa batas... hindi po kaplastikan yun, yun po ang tunay na nagpapakatutuo... sa probinsya po ba ninyo ay payag kayong utu-utuin at paikutin ng mga ito? kung totoo po ay hindi na po plastik yun, baka cellophane na lang... PEACE Acheng!!!

Mamaw™
September 23rd, 2008, 06:23 PM
ang init naman dito..hehehehe