Custom Search

View Full Version : Does Your Helmet Meet DOT Safety Standards?


joe black
June 10th, 2008, 10:22 AM
Motorcycle Safety Helmets

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 218, Motorcycle Helmets, on August 20, 1973. The standard went into effect on March 1, 1974, and was most recently amended on October 3, 1988.

All motorcycle helmets sold in the United States are required by law to meet or exceed the minimum performance requirements established by FMVSS 218. These requirements include minimum impact and penetration capabilities, chin strap retention qualities, and a 210-degree field of view, along with a number of labeling requirements. To certify that their helmets meet all the requirements of FMVSS 218, a manufacturer places the letters “DOT” on the back of each helmet. This lettering is often referred to as a “DOT label” or “DOT sticker.” If a manufacturer sells a helmet certified as meeting the FMVSS standard and NHTSA discovers the helmet does not, NHTSA conducts an investigation that can result in the manufacturer's having to recall the helmets in question. Recently, the manufacture and sale of costume or novelty helmets has dramatically increased. These helmets, if not sold as motorcycle helmets, are not required to meet FMVSS 218. If the manufacturer does not place a DOT sticker on the back of the helmet, they are not certifying that the product meets FMVSS 218, and they do not claim that it offers any protection at all to the wearer. A problem arises with a novelty helmet when its manufacturer or distributor encloses or offers a DOT label separately for the consumer to place on the back of the helmet. Reputable manufacturers place the DOT sticker on their helmets before shipping them to distributors.

Most state helmet use laws require motorcyclists to wear helmets that meet FMVSS 218. NHTSA has developed a training videotape and an informational brochure to assist law enforcement personnel in identifying helmets that do not meet this national standard. For copies of the video and brochure, call NHTSA at (202) 366-1739.

FMVSS 218 Requirements

A DOT label must be affixed to the center, lower back of each approved helmet.

FMVSS 218 also requires the manufacturer to sew into the helmet liner a label or labels that can be easily read without removing padding or any permanent part. This label must include following information:


Manufacturer's name or identification
Precise model designation
Size
Month and year of manufacture, which can be spelled out (June 1988) or expressed in numerals (6/88).
Instructions to the purchaser as follows:
“Shell and liner constructed of (types of materials spelled out).”
“Helmet can be seriously damaged by some common substances without damage being visible to the user. Apply only the following: (recommended cleaning agents, paints, adhesives).”
“Make no modifications. Fasten helmet securely. If the helmet experiences a severe blow, return it to the manufacturer for inspection or destroy it and replace it.”
A helmet must have an inner liner, about one-inch thick and made of polystyrene (styrofoam).
The chin strap must be strong and well-attached.
There can be no attachments or protrusions over two-tenths of an inch long.


Indicators Of An Illegal Helmet

The following is a list of items, in lay terms, that are indicators of illegal helmets.

If there are protrusions from the helmet such as the old German style with a spike on the top (World War I vintage), it will not meet the FMVSS standard. (Caution: Some helmets styled like World War II German helmets are legal. Some very reputable manufacturers produce them to meet FMVSS.)

If the helmet consists of a beanie that covers only the very top of the rider's head, it probably doesn't meet the standard.

If the helmet has a web liner, no padding, or padding only, or a thin shell of less than one inch of styrofoam on the inside, it likely will not meet FMVSS 218.

Fake helmets usually weigh less than one pound, whereas legal helmets usually weigh more than three pounds.

If the strap is less than one-half inch wide, or with a single strap attached to the helmet, it probably doesn't meet the federal standard.

If the strap is poorly attached with small rivets, it probably doesn't meet the standard.

If a DOT label is on the lower back of the helmet, but you suspect it really does not meet FMVSS 218, inspect the inside of the helmet to see if the manufacturer has complied with the labeling requirements previously described. If all labeling requirements are not met, the helmet does not meet FMVSS requirements.

Helmets may have labels from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or the Snell Memorial Foundation, which has somewhat different requirements. However, the DOT standard is the only one the helmet is required by law to meet.

This information was provided by NHTSA's Safety Countermeasures Division and compiled by the Licensing Depart-ment of the Motorcycle Safety Foundation.

Wide_Load
June 10th, 2008, 10:28 AM
My helmet is not DOT certified. It is not legal to use in the U.S.

Jeoforms
June 10th, 2008, 11:10 AM
May batas bang ganito dito sa Pilipinas?

d'virus
June 11th, 2008, 08:49 PM
Batas???...... Pilipinas??? :O

Sorry po, jok lang... meron atang batas jan, di nga lang pinapansin..

VASILI
June 11th, 2008, 08:52 PM
ha? huhulihen na ren pag hinde [dot] wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

pepe1275
June 11th, 2008, 09:57 PM
hahaha dito nga eh kahit tabo pwede na sa ulo para di lang mahuli nang pulis.=)

brand0
June 11th, 2008, 10:07 PM
May batas bang ganito dito sa Pilipinas?

meron panukala si sen bong revillia jr. kaso base sa mga narinig namin noong convention sa UPLB, mukhang puro butas na naman yung batas na panukala nya at walang masusing pagaaral na ginawa base sa mga kondisyon dito sa Pilipinas.

jenjadnaed
June 11th, 2008, 10:11 PM
pati nga yun bullcap type ginagamit dito... yun bang pang construction... hehehe

one_luna
June 12th, 2008, 01:42 PM
IMHO importante kasi itong dot and snel requirements for our own safety. these are the basis of quality. may kamahalan lang po pero pwede namang pag-ipunan:)

jenjadnaed
June 12th, 2008, 06:51 PM
oo nga po... di po kylangan tipirin ang sariling kaligtasan... di po naka schedule ang aksidente dpat po parati tyo handa... ingat po para sa lahat

Jeoforms
June 12th, 2008, 06:52 PM
Batas???...... Pilipinas???

Sorry po, jok lang... meron atang batas jan, di nga lang pinapansin..

Sabagay, hindi naman yung batas ang problema dito sa atin kundi law enforcement.

IronWolf
June 12th, 2008, 07:00 PM
mine is... uhhh... well... the thing is.... uhhh... eii.... no... nope http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t142/ironwolf7609/smileys/signsandflags37.gif

IronWolf
June 12th, 2008, 07:06 PM
I have read the article on post number 1, of the TS.

FYI, do you know that some states in US that allows bikers to ride with no helmet?

Some states naman merong age factors... like riders 16 years old below are required to wear helmet.

Some states... strictly Helmet Required.

So sino ang mas malabo? Pinas or US? ;)

joe black
June 13th, 2008, 01:43 AM
it is sad that a non-human entity such as a State had to protect itself by enforcing certain laws to ensure the safety of its existence. laws such as the mandatory wearing of helmets protects citizens, thus, ensuring the survival of the State.

what is even more sad is that humans, motorcycle riders in particular, care less about his own safety and throws away simple precautionary measures so that he can continue to enjoy one of the things he values--freedom to ride.

but then again, it is his life, his responsibility--to protect or not to protect, that is the question. but when other people's lives are somehow dependent on this rider's one life--can we really say that his life is completely "his"?

we often hate law enforcers whose sole purpose every lunch time is to take away the little income in our pockets, monies which we feed our families. he may even take what we are about to buy our kilo of rice for the day. but if his greediness saves our life even for just a day, we can at least be thankful that at times we may have survived because we were forced to wear our helmets :)

but if we do value our lives, then at least we need to take the correct steps in ensuring our safety. and it is not because there are laws we are afraid to break, rather, because we want to protect ourselves. and it begins by wearing the right kind of helmet :)

Wide_Load
June 13th, 2008, 08:05 AM
... and it begins by wearing the right kind of helmet :)

Very well said sir. But as a reminder, not all good standards need come from America's DOT and Snell alone. The European ECE R 22/05 may equal if not even exceed DOT/Snell on some important parameters too.

It's sometimes better from an extended point of view.

d'virus
June 13th, 2008, 08:40 AM
I'm a firm believer of wearing the PROPER gears ALL THE TIME.... (at least helmet, armoured jacket & gloves & shoes) kahit puntang kanto lng ako..

yes, me kamahalan... but there is no sense using a rope as a seatbelt so to speak...

plus if you really think about it, minsan mas mahal pa yung mga burloloy sa MC natin kesa sa proper helmet eh...

do yourself a favour gents, and get a certified helmet, if anything, meron kang "bragging rights"....


my 2c worth po......

act2000
June 13th, 2008, 09:29 AM
dito sa pinas. to each his own.

Si senator bong revilla is trying to put together a helmet law which he intends to pass in the senate and congress this year.

What it essentially does is to require all provinces to enforce all motorcycle riders and its backriders to wear a helmet -- whether full face or half face or open face. What is happening today is each municipality or city has their own interpretation of the helmet law which is quite funny. Imagine riding in metro manila wearing a full face helmet and all of a sudden be stopped in marikina for not following their ordinance..in marikina full face helmets is not allowed....This is so confusing to the rider who thinks that wearing a full face helmet gives him better safety and thus be accepted.

As far as safety standards is concerned -- medyo debatable pa because the country does not have the facility to determine what is an acceptable "safe" helmet. Relying solely on what manufacturers put on their helmet is not effective at all.

Ang payo ko lang dito -- do your research whenever you buy a helmet. Manufacturer websites help a lot.

pace:s

joe black
June 14th, 2008, 08:32 AM
Imagine riding in metro manila wearing a full face helmet and all of a sudden be stopped in marikina for not following their ordinance..in marikina full face helmet is not allowed....




talaga? city ordinance? i didn't know bawal sa Marikina ang full-face helmets. buti na lang di ako nagagawi doon (di pa... hehehe). Someone needs to "educate" the Mayor and His Councilors in Marikina :O

nikolai
June 15th, 2008, 07:45 PM
I think mine does --- HJC open face, basic model CL-5. I hope I don't have to find out how well it works.

MR_2
June 15th, 2008, 09:03 PM
mga bro IMHO lang. it would be best na di lang tayo magsettle sa mga DOT approved helmets.kase DOT standards are not that stringent.besides its up to the manufactures to conduct their own tests on their products.that means they could manipulate the outcome. IMHO we should choose helmets that are SNELL approved. since SNELL is known to be as the STANDARD in terms of the quality and safety of helmets. :)

jodes
June 15th, 2008, 11:52 PM
my first 2 helmets are hjc so their DOT approved. just recently, i bought a zeus jet helmet . and upon reading this thread , i checked if it has the same approval and to my dismay its not. any feedback on the safety of zeus helmets?

Jeoforms
June 16th, 2008, 05:15 AM
I have two lids they are not that expensive but I believe they meet DOT/ECE safety standards. Spyder Enduro is DOT certified and the other one is Spyder Cranium meets DOT/ECE.

I think those noisy open pipes are more expensive than these helmets so everyone should get a lid rather than those irritating things.

crazycoolchic
June 17th, 2008, 02:35 PM
ang index kaya DOT approved?how will i know?

IronWolf
June 17th, 2008, 02:53 PM
...I think those noisy open pipes are more expensive than these helmets so everyone should get a lid rather than those irritating things.

hmmm... you think? :rolleyes:

ryan
June 17th, 2008, 05:18 PM
my first 2 helmets are hjc so their DOT approved. just recently, i bought a zeus jet helmet . and upon reading this thread , i checked if it has the same approval and to my dismay its not. any feedback on the safety of zeus helmets?

Hi! Almost all Zeus helmets here carry the ECE 22.05 safety rating which arguably is a stricter certification. Only DOT model we have is the Zeus 508/508W.

Thanks!!

jodes
June 17th, 2008, 09:08 PM
tnx... just visited motoworld trinoma this afternoon. and bought a tinted visor for my zeus.

abercrombie
June 17th, 2008, 11:42 PM
oo naman.. ...

Payon Hunter
June 17th, 2008, 11:49 PM
YES, all 3, agv bali, soumy gunwind & hjc ac-12 carbon

act2000
June 18th, 2008, 02:27 AM
mga bro IMHO lang. it would be best na di lang tayo magsettle sa mga DOT approved helmets.kase DOT standards are not that stringent.besides its up to the manufactures to conduct their own tests on their products.that means they could manipulate the outcome. IMHO we should choose helmets that are SNELL approved. since SNELL is known to be as the STANDARD in terms of the quality and safety of helmets. :)

If we choose only SNELL standard helmets then we limit our choice of helmets because snell does not approve half face, open face or flip-up helmets. These three types of helmets constitute the majority of helmets sold in the Philippines. While there is no doubt that snell has set a very high standard to follow, it is not as important as wearing a helmet -- miski buko helmet lang -- in the Philippines. Majority of the riders in the country, especially in the provinces still do not wear helmets.....

snoozer*21
June 18th, 2008, 08:39 AM
If we choose only SNELL standard helmets then we limit our choice of helmets because snell does not approve half face, open face or flip-up helmets. These three types of helmets constitute the majority of helmets sold in the Philippines. While there is no doubt that snell has set a very high standard to follow, it is not as important as wearing a helmet -- miski buko helmet lang -- in the Philippines. Majority of the riders in the country, especially in the provinces still do not wear helmets.....

the bottom line here is, everybody should at least have their helmets DOT/SNELL approved for their own safety. And i can suggest that one of them are HJC/SHARK helmets that bears the DOT/SNELL APPROVED which is more affordable at this time because its still on sale, not only that, we should raise our standard on safety in other words, "magkano ba ang mga ulo natin kapag kumalat tayo?" ...think again :rolleyes:

pd1792t
June 22nd, 2008, 08:12 PM
what brands are readily available dito sa manila that is DOT/SNELL certified?what is the general price range for it?

johnarnel_08
June 22nd, 2008, 09:12 PM
i think my helmet meets the DOT standards.. coz my helmet has a DOT sticker on the back.. and its Zeus.. hehehe!! wala lang..

escobar
July 4th, 2008, 10:13 PM
ang index kaya DOT approved?how will i know?


Hindi DOT approved ang Index sa pagkakaalam ko. i-angat nyo yung mga foam paddings para makita kung may certification stickers. Pag wala, tsk, tsk, tsk.

darkbenz
July 5th, 2008, 04:24 PM
Caberg Rhyno (http://www.motoworldph.com/motoworld_products?118)

http://www.motoworldph.com/e107_plugins/motoworld_products/images/thumb_thumb_rhyno.gif (http://www.motoworldph.com/motoworld_products?118)
PRODUCT FEATURES:
• Mid-range modular helmet with built in retractable sun visor
• Fog free, anti-scratch clear visor with adjustable anti-scratch smoke visor (Double Visor Tech.)
• Removable and washable Sanitized lining
• Compact and stylish shape

STANDARD PASSED : ECE 22.05

Ito po yung gamit ko ECE approve!

bacolodnon
July 5th, 2008, 04:35 PM
My TX911 has DOT approved seal sa ilalim ng padding. so i think Index is DOT approved....hope it is for real

noypito
August 27th, 2008, 07:26 PM
nice info.

bacolodnon
August 27th, 2008, 07:35 PM
thanks sir noypito. i think its time to change my TX911 :)

keankean
August 27th, 2008, 08:45 PM
what brands are readily available dito sa manila that is DOT/SNELL certified?what is the general price range for it?

i suggest sa motoworld sir, my "shark rfs" is DOT and SNELL certified. the price is of my helmet is p6500.. usually dot/snell certified helmets are much expensive than the regular one. like index, carting, etc.....

keankean
August 27th, 2008, 08:51 PM
my first 2 helmets are hjc so their DOT approved. just recently, i bought a zeus jet helmet . and upon reading this thread , i checked if it has the same approval and to my dismay its not. any feedback on the safety of zeus helmets?


zeus jet helmet is not DOT certified or approved, because it's a half face, i think, em i right sir?correct me if im wrong?

dot certified helmets are usually fullface helmets.. watch youtube on how they test SNELL and DOT Certified helmets...:D

noypito
August 27th, 2008, 09:58 PM
zeus jet helmet is not DOT certified or approved, because it's a half face, i think, em i right sir?correct me if im wrong?

dot certified helmets are usually fullface helmets.. watch youtube on how they test SNELL and DOT Certified helmets...:D
DOT does not certify or approve any helmet. read the post of the TS.

OSORIO
August 28th, 2008, 09:14 AM
BRAND : Caberg Helmets (Italy)
MODEL : Rhyno
STANDARD : ECE 22.05

PRODUCT FEATURES:
• Mid-range modular helmet with built in retractable sun visor
• Fog free, anti-scratch clear visor with adjustable anti-scratch smoke visor (Double Visor Tech.)
• Removable and washable Sanitized lining
• Compact and stylish shape

COLOR/S : Metallic Black, Matte Black, Silver

http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/4570/dsc0269borderjy0.jpg

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/7012/dsc0274borderig6.jpg

http://www.webbikeworld.com/r2/motorcycle-helmet/caberg-trip/caberg-trip.gif