mga boss isa bang uri ng pangigipit at diskriminasyon nanaman sa ating mga nakmotor ang obligahin ka na mag shoes at pantlon pg nagmomotor? sakin ksi hasttle e.

.

eh sino ba ang nagpipilit na magsuot ng shoes at pantalon tuwing nagmomotor?


.

anu nanaman yan?

bhira sino nanaman nagbabawal? bakit nakakasilaw ba legs natin?
eh pano kung si christine reyes naka vespa tas ang soot ay panty shorts sisitahin ba nila?

mga boss isa bang uri ng pangigipit at diskriminasyon nanaman sa ating mga nakmotor ang obligahin ka na mag shoes at pantlon pg nagmomotor? sakin ksi hasttle e.

Di naman siguro hassle sa iyo mawalan ng daliri sa paa, o ma-tocino ang balat?

Remember, our country's law is made in retrospect, kung may mangyari, saka pa lang gagawa ng batas about it. This is 'in prevention' to what could happen.

Even though it's not a law, all riders are 'encouraged' to do them. At least, at the very least-proper gears.

yes sir tama ka jan mabute na mag pants ka

Hindi naman siguro pinipilit ang ayaw
magsapatos at magpantalon.
Total, paa nila ang mapipilay at
matotocino kung maaksidente.

Sige, kung saan kayo maligaya.

i think this is OK...


kaya lang hassle talaga kung malapit lang pupunthan mo...pero you have to use public roads... :o

imho wala akong nakikitang masama, tungkol dito...

ang mag-pantalon at naka sapatos pag ikaw ay mag-momotor... ay para sa ating pansariling proteksyon...

agree ako dito.

Di naman siguro hassle sa iyo mawalan ng daliri sa paa, o ma-tocino ang balat?

Remember, our country's law is made in retrospect, kung may mangyari, saka pa lang gagawa ng batas about it. This is 'in prevention' to what could happen.

Even though it's not a law, all riders are 'encouraged' to do them. At least, at the very least-proper gears.

Amen, Amen to that! very well said, sir ardiepot! may i salute you as well as, sir vasili, sir phat_05, and sir papabong!!!

common sense lang naman yan, eh! it's just like, pag alam mong mainit ang hahawakan mo, kahit sandali lang, ay maglalagay ka ng pang-sapin sa kamay para hindi mapaso o mapaltos ang kamay mo!!! o kaya ay magpapayong pag alam mong umuulan, kahit sa tapat(accross the street) lang ng bahay ang pupuntahan mo!!!

nagtataka nga po ako, madalas po akong makakita ng mga bikers na nakahelmet na, nakagloves at jacket pa, tapos nakashorts at tsinelas! :?:eek: i just cannot phatom to the abbys of my uncertainty(wow, heavy! joke laang phow!), what's the LOGIC in doing that? :? or, is there LOGIC?????

***baka po may magsasabi na naman na "personal standard" ko lang na naman ito! sorry po, "common sense" po ang tawag dito, or plain LOGIC... kahit itanong nyo po sa bata...

Sir Jess, Dapat nga may protection tayo. Pero, may added protection po ba ang jeans sa pag semplang? o pareho lang kung naka shorts?

Yung sapatos dapat ata yun kasi madulas at walang support ang tsinelas. E kung madulas ka sa break mo makakadamay yan.

yun iba nga kung mag motor naka boxer lang e...panu yan??

hinde pa naman na emplement yan?

peru dapat talga ganyan...kahet jogging pants pwede na

Sir Jess, Dapat nga may protection tayo. Pero, may added protection po ba ang jeans sa pag semplang? o pareho lang kung naka shorts?

Yung sapatos dapat ata yun kasi madulas at walang support ang tsinelas. E kung madulas ka sa break mo makakadamay yan.

may silbi din po talaga ang denims or any kind of pants for that matter! kaysa direct skin contact po, pants muna ang masisira bago ang skin... it already happened to me, medyo matibay pa yung denims kaya bugbog lang ang legs ko at walang gasgas...

mga sir agree po ako na may safety factors po ito. pero kasi..:nuts::nuts: hehe makulit. sa SBMA po ito pinagbawal, ngstart po sya nun LABOR day. without notice e bigla silang nag deklara na bawal ang nkashorts at wlang sapatos kelangan long pants at shoes not necesariliy denims. ang malupit pa po nito napagalaman ko sa isang SBMA officer na dapat nun may 1 lang ito effective dahil my kung sinung GENERAL daw ang nandun pero naisip nila na ituloy tuloy na, kaya ko na isip na discriminasyon nanaman ito.. napaka strict po ng traffic rules sa SBMA na naaapreciate naming lahat for sefety reasons pero bakit ganun? MAY DRESSCODE na sa pgmomotor ngaun??:eek:: kasi ang dating parang naaalibadbaran sila sa mga nkamotor na nakapambahay lang habang may mga general at turistang banyaga na kakalat kalat dito.:s:s hindi po ako galit hehe mukhang kelngan nanaman namin harapin ang diskriminasyong ito dito.ganun eh MAY DRESSCODE!

mga sir agree po ako na may safety factors po ito. pero kasi..:nuts::nuts: hehe makulit. sa SBMA po ito pinagbawal, ngstart po sya nun LABOR day. without notice e bigla silang nag deklara na bawal ang nkashorts at wlang sapatos kelangan long pants at shoes not necesariliy denims. ang malupit pa po nito napagalaman ko sa isang SBMA officer na dapat nun may 1 lang ito effective dahil my kung sinung GENERAL daw ang nandun pero naisip nila na ituloy tuloy na, kaya ko na isip na discriminasyon nanaman ito.. napaka strict po ng traffic rules sa SBMA na naaapreciate naming lahat for sefety reasons pero bakit ganun? MAY DRESSCODE na sa pgmomotor ngaun??:eek:: kasi ang dating parang naaalibadbaran sila sa mga nkamotor na nakapambahay lang habang may mga general at turistang banyaga na kakalat kalat dito.:s:s hindi po ako galit hehe mukhang kelngan nanaman namin harapin ang diskriminasyong ito dito.ganun eh MAY DRESSCODE!

sa ibang bansa kasi, bawal talaga naka-short and slipper pag mag-momotor...

kumbaga...itinataas lang ang moralidad ng isang motorista...

hindi ba magandang tingnan, kung pagdating ng panahon makikita natin ang lahat ng nakasakay sa motor e, naka safety gear....

darating yang panahon na yan vradd... shoes & pants (w/ helmet ha)+1 ako jan kahit short trip lang...

yup tama yun sir. that is why hindi ko na kokontrahin for safety ko din naman e, ayoko lang yung reasons nila bakit nila pinatupad ito and wihout prior notice.. strikto sila with helmets na tama lng nman. pero iniisip ko lang n dapat may kumausap sa mga taong to' baka sa susunod bawal na ang 2 wheels sa SBMA..hmmm:nuts::nuts:

mga sir agree po ako na may safety factors po ito. pero kasi..:nuts::nuts: hehe makulit. sa SBMA po ito pinagbawal, ngstart po sya nun LABOR day. without notice e bigla silang nag deklara na bawal ang nkashorts at wlang sapatos kelangan long pants at shoes not necesariliy denims. ang malupit pa po nito napagalaman ko sa isang SBMA officer na dapat nun may 1 lang ito effective dahil my kung sinung GENERAL daw ang nandun pero naisip nila na ituloy tuloy na, kaya ko na isip na discriminasyon nanaman ito.. napaka strict po ng traffic rules sa SBMA na naaapreciate naming lahat for sefety reasons pero bakit ganun? MAY DRESSCODE na sa pgmomotor ngaun??:eek:: kasi ang dating parang naaalibadbaran sila sa mga nkamotor na nakapambahay lang habang may mga general at turistang banyaga na kakalat kalat dito.:s:s hindi po ako galit hehe mukhang kelngan nanaman namin harapin ang diskriminasyong ito dito.ganun eh MAY DRESSCODE!

sir, hindi po diskriminasyon ang tawag diyan, kundi "disiplina"... nakita po siguro nila na tama at magaling pala ang naging instant and without notice na ipinagbabawal nila, kaya namulat sila at itinuloy-tuloy na nila...

kayo na rin po ang nagsabi na "nakamotor na nakapambahay lang", hindi "nakamotor na nakapangmotor"... PEACE and RIDE SAFELY sa lahat ng BIKERS...

pants and shoes lang ba sabi..


pede pala ako magsando dyan...


o topless.. :D


Juk juk juk..:D

coming from a rider who "crashed" several times thank goodness i was wearing shoes and jeans and the mandatory helmet.

first of all we have a helmet law no argument about that.implementation is another topic.rider's prerogative to wear one is plain stupid and suicidal

the subject matter is wearing of pants and shoes.
when purchasing any displacement bike it is always accompanied by a user's manual and it is BOLDLY stated OPERATOR SHOULD WEAR PROPER PROTECTION (ie;helmet,eye protection,gloves,pants,shoes,etc) WHENEVER OPERATING THIS VEHICLE..


let us all ride safe

yup. being a law abiding citizen and an advocate for safety i would and i am following. sana lang po ay for the right reason na na isip nila to, for the longest time na hindi nila inimplement without notice babaguhin nila policy, at hindi dahil may general lng dyan at naiirita sila sa mga nkamotor na nakashort lang. if for safety kaya nila naisip then thanks to them:clap: pero other than that tamaan sila ng kidlat!!hehehe joke:clap::clap:

sa akin ayus lang....

it's about time. wag niyo sana masamain ito kung ipatupad man sa lahat ng lugar. it's for the the mc user's sake/safety.

mga boss isa bang uri ng pangigipit at diskriminasyon nanaman sa ating mga nakmotor ang obligahin ka na mag shoes at pantlon pg nagmomotor? sakin ksi hasttle e.

depenede cguro sakin sir kapag malapit lang pupuntahan ko di na ako ng papagtalon short lang ako pwede na. alangan namn pupunta lang ako palengke may shoes sak pangtalon pa ako. hirap maglabo noh...

Para sa'kin, it's your call.

hangin' shirt at short shorts para sa mga lalaking rider..hehehe..


wiiiiiiiiittttttttttt wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pag init shots lang ........ at metro lang kasi...... dati naka riding pants ako at komenie,,, pero , at spidi shoes.... minsan hirap mag blend sa crowd pag ganun kaya...... basta comfy ako ...
helmet...... kahit isankg km lang naka helmet ako

depende na rin siguro kung gaano kalayo ang ride mo...kung dyan lang naman, hmmmm bahala ka na kung gusto mo....

it's about time. wag niyo sana masamain ito kung ipatupad man sa lahat ng lugar. it's for the the mc user's sake/safety.

very well said, sir ron!!!

and people in their right mind will not think otherwise... but, masama talaga ang effect ng air pollution sa mental/psychological reasoning ng tao...

nung panahon namin, hindi kami makalabas ng bahay ng hindi nakapantalon at sapatos... magmotor pa kaya na wala man lamang sapin ang balat mo pag naka-contact sa hard/sharp objects sa kalsada?????

bakit nga daw ba babawalan sila na "magmotor na nakapangbahay"? e di ba, hindi nga kasi "nakapangmotor", eh!!!!





http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/2995/animated237ag0.gif




http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/2425/danceku9.gif









:?

If you knew beforehand you were gonna spill on your way to the store, you'd take the necessary precaution. Thing is, you don't know, so all the more reason to prepare. Accidents happen when you least expect it, statistically, when you're on familiar ground, like inside the subd or a daily route. Pants and shoes are the least items in taking caution, i don't see why people find it a problem to wear them when going out for a ride.

My old aunt who drives a cage says riders whom she sees wearing only puruntong shorts and slippers doing 80kmh at EDSA look really cheap. It creates a wrong first impression that generalizes the entire biking community. It's impossible naman daw for these people not to have even a decent pair of pants or shoes. In a sense, I agree with her. All riders are ambassadors one way or another of the riding community. Some wear jackets or uniforms representing their groups. The word is representation. To the majority of the non-riding population, you are how they see you. I guess some riders just don't give a dung.

I vaguely remember a time when PUV drivers were required to wear blue collared polo shirts? Same reason applies I believe.

yup. being a law abiding citizen and an advocate for safety i would and i am following. sana lang po ay for the right reason na na isip nila to, for the longest time na hindi nila inimplement without notice babaguhin nila policy, at hindi dahil may general lng dyan at naiirita sila sa mga nkamotor na nakashort lang. if for safety kaya nila naisip then thanks to them:clap: pero other than that tamaan sila ng kidlat!!hehehe joke:clap::clap:

sir lahat naman ng bikes manual clearly states to wear bright and protective clothing (which would mean longpants and shoes) to prevent injuries in case of spills. sumemplang ka nga lang sa bisikleta naku, tocino at longganisa na abot mo e, kulang na lang sinangag hehehehe. even he MSF strongly recommends wearing long pants and shoes (and if possible pa nga leather pants and boots)

ITs always the morons who say:
"had i worn pants,shoes and a helmet,i wouldn't be in so much pain!"

"next time i'll wear the proper gear"

"next time i'll set my limit to 8 bottles instead of 12 before hopping on my motorcycle"-OOPS WRONG THREAD

Hello Everyone,

IMO one should at least wear jeans to protect their skin on their legs and shoes to protect their feet and toes. I know this is not enough, but I think it's better than shorts and flip flops.

I don't think we need a law to enforce this, as this should be common sense - Protecting yourself in the event of an accident.

Everytime we go out riding, we put ourselves at risk. There is no way of avoiding that risk as we have to go to our jobs, run our errands, meet our friends, and basically live our lives. The best thing we can do is reduce that risk by driving defensively, wearing protective gears, and insuring our bikes/selves.

Hello Everyone,

IMO one should at least wear jeans to protect their skin on their legs and shoes to protect their feet and toes. I know this is not enough, but I think it's better than shorts and flip flops.

I don't think we need a law to enforce this, as this should be common sense - Protecting yourself in the event of an accident.

Everytime we go out riding, we put ourselves at risk. There is no way of avoiding that risk as we have to go to our jobs, run our errands, meet our friends, and basically live our lives. The best thing we can do is reduce that risk by driving defensively, wearing protective gears, and insuring our bikes/selves.

AMEN, AMEN to that!!! very well said Sir Uziel!!!

ITs always the morons who would say:
"had i worn pants,shoes and a helmet,i wouldn't be in so much pain!"

"next time i'll wear the proper gear"

"next time i'll set my limit to 8 bottles instead of 12 before hopping on my motorcycle"-OOPS WRONG THREAD

exactly, sir aservino!!! kaya marami akong nakadebate dito... pinipalabas nila na ako ang moron after more than 31 years of riding bikes(small and big)...

sir lahat naman ng bikes manual clearly states to wear bright and protective clothing (which would mean longpants and shoes) to prevent injuries in case of spills. sumemplang ka nga lang sa bisikleta naku, tocino at longganisa na abot mo e, kulang na lang sinangag hehehehe. even the MSF strongly recommends wearing long pants and shoes (and if possible pa nga leather pants and boots)

sir zeke, meron nang namilosopo sa akin na "pag naka shoes and pants ka daw ba ay may magagawa yan pag sumemplang ka ng matindi"???

If you knew beforehand you were gonna spill on your way to the store, you'd take the necessary precaution. Thing is, you don't know, so all the more reason to prepare. Accidents happen when you least expect it, statistically, when you're on familiar ground, like inside the subd or a daily route. Pants and shoes are the least items in taking caution, i don't see why people find it a problem to wear them when going out for a ride.

My old aunt who drives a cage says riders whom she sees wearing only puruntong shorts and slippers doing 80kmh at EDSA look really cheap. It creates a wrong first impression that generalizes the entire biking community. It's impossible naman daw for these people not to have even a decent pair of pants or shoes. In a sense, I agree with her. All riders are ambassadors one way or another of the riding community. Some wear jackets or uniforms representing their groups. The word is representation. To the majority of the non-riding population, you are how they see you. I guess some riders just don't give a dung.

I vaguely remember a time when PUV drivers were required to wear blue collared polo shirts? Same reason applies I believe.

Jauhn, humanda ka na sa maraming kokontra sayo...

there's such a saying that goes: "dress for the fall, not for the ride".

ang ugali kasi na karamihan sa atin is yung kung kelan nagka-aksidente saka pa lang matututo. aba e buti kung di apektado pamilya mo. kada aksidente, kada semplang ang tatamaan palagi mga mahal natin sa buhay. kaya dapat po proactive palagi tayo. para sa ating pamilya yun

actually, dati iniimplement yun ganitong batas or ordinansa sa QC. way back 95 or 96. bawal ang naka sando, naka shorts at naka sinelas. ewan ko lng kng bakit di na ngayon.

actually, dati iniimplement yun ganitong batas or ordinansa sa QC. way back 95 or 96. bawal ang naka sando, naka shorts at naka sinelas. ewan ko lng kng bakit di na ngayon.
that's a good example of what we call "ningas-cugon" mentality of all authorities!!! ika nga, eh... "lilipas din yan!"















=b

sir zeke, meron nang namilosopo sa akin na "pag naka shoes and pants ka daw ba ay may magagawa yan pag sumemplang ka ng matindi"???




example ko lang sarili ko nung nag semplang kami ng troops ko naka pants at shoes kami... bale that time ay naka bangga kami ng tricyle na biglang lumiko so tendency di na kami nag preno at hinayaan na lang namin bumangga yung scoot namin sa tricycle sumadsad katawan namin sa semento no serious injury naman ang nagyari samin pero pag uwi ko at pag hubad ng pants kita ko pwet ko may paltos resulta cguro nung friction ng pag sadsad namin sa kalsada... try to think kung naka shorts lang kami baka di lang paltos inabot ng wetpaks ko:O:O

sir jess ganyan din palagi naririnig ko sa mga kasama ko sa planta. mga pilosopo hehehe. dati suot ko yung armor ko, ganyan din sabi sa akin nung isa. tapos maya maya hihipo na sa armor tapos magtatanong kung magkano :D

Ang sabihin mo, hindi sya pumasa sa standards mo kaya nasabi mong pasaway sya. malay mo naman nag mamadali talaga yung tao. Anong standard yang sinasabi mo? Standard nino? I know what you are saying sir jesspadua. Ang point ko lang eh, wag naman husgahan ang kapwa nating riders na "pasaway". Dahil ba nakita nyo na walang sapatos, jacket at pants eh, pasaway na agad? Parang wala ring pinakaiba itong thread na ito dun sa kabilang thread na ang pinag uusapan, bakit galit ang mga riders sa kapwa riders na hindi nag hehelmet. Marami dun hinusgahan na ng iba na "bobo" yung mga hindi nag hehelmet. Tama ba yun?

sana naman, makita nila itong thread na ito...



http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9222/hotmm4.gif



http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/2425/danceku9.gif





...:?

sa totoo lang dapat po talaga tayong naka long pants at naka shoes pag nag momotor. pero hinde naman dapat ito ipilit. nasa nag momotor na po yun.

sa helmet muna sila mag higpit at manghuli, kesa yung ibang pag kakakitaan ang kanilang iniisip. dami daming hinde naka helmet, hinde naman hinuhuli

that's a good example of what we call "ningas-cugon" mentality of all authorities!!! ika nga, eh... "lilipas din yan!"













actually, kababasa lng ng friend ko kanina ang bagong batas/regulation/ordinansa ng coming from LTO. bawal na nga ang shorts, sando and slippers. in addition to that, bawal na rin daw ang basag na headlight, taillight, brake light, signal lights that are not working properly etc... etc... etc... and eto pa ang masarap dyan, no helmet... 1,500php fine! hehehe. siguradong maraming mag aalbur***** motorista neto. :eek:

actually, kababasa lng ng friend ko kanina ang bagong batas/regulation/ordinansa ng coming from LTO. bawal na nga ang shorts, sando and slippers. in addition to that, bawal na rin daw ang basag na headlight, taillight, brake light, signal lights that are not working properly etc... etc... etc... and eto pa ang masarap dyan, no helmet... 1,500php fine! hehehe. siguradong maraming mag aalbur***** motorista neto. :eek:
actually po, dati nang bawal ang mga iyan, eversince i started riding bikes in the late 70's... lumipas na lang po... ang nabago lang po ay ang amount ng ng "no helmet" fine(tumaas na po talaga)...:o

actually, kababasa lng ng friend ko kanina ang bagong batas/regulation/ordinansa ng coming from LTO. bawal na nga ang shorts, sando and slippers. in addition to that, bawal na rin daw ang basag na headlight, taillight, brake light, signal lights that are not working properly etc... etc... etc... and eto pa ang masarap dyan, no helmet... 1,500php fine! hehehe. siguradong maraming mag aalbur***** motorista neto. :eek:

ganyan naman karamihan sa atin. pag walang batas, magrereklamo di daw ginagawan ng aksyon. pag nagpatupad ng batas, reklamo din ang maririnig mo. walang pagpipilian e hehehehe. mapapraning ka lang. :D

very informative po lahat ng post nu mga sir, salamat po. like ive said, im not againts this policy, lalo na kung ang iniisip nila e for the safety of us riders,..
"for the right reasons" ika nga.

Shorts & Pants its really up to me kung ano ang susuot ko, dipende sa location na pupunthan dipende sa layo na tatakbuhin pero isa lang lagi ang hindi ko makakalimutan malayo man o malapit HELMET ko. IMO

ganyan naman karamihan sa atin. pag walang batas, magrereklamo di daw ginagawan ng aksyon. pag nagpatupad ng batas, reklamo din ang maririnig mo. walang pagpipilian e hehehehe. mapapraning ka lang. :D

tama ka dito sir... daming batas hinde naman napapatupad. hinde na kailangan ng bagong batas...dahil may batas na dyan... continous implementation ang kailangan natin :D

i will support this one...saka yung 3 passenger sa UB dapat bawal na din ,overloading yun...

actually, kababasa lng ng friend ko kanina ang bagong batas/regulation/ordinansa ng coming from LTO. bawal na nga ang shorts, sando and slippers. in addition to that, bawal na rin daw ang basag na headlight, taillight, brake light, signal lights that are not working properly etc... etc... etc... and eto pa ang masarap dyan, no helmet... 1,500php fine! hehehe. siguradong maraming mag aalbur***** motorista neto. :eek:

old laws na to..di lang talaga na implement...sana ngayun totohanan na

totoo din ba na dapat eh DOT certified na mga helmet gagamitin?

dati kasi ok lang kahit ano basta may suot na helmet...